{"id":143,"date":"2014-03-02T16:14:43","date_gmt":"2014-03-03T00:14:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/colinschimmelfing.com\/blog\/?p=143"},"modified":"2014-03-02T16:14:43","modified_gmt":"2014-03-03T00:14:43","slug":"braided-streets-my-proposal-for-how-to-organize-traffic-in-sf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/colinschimmelfing.com\/blog\/braided-streets-my-proposal-for-how-to-organize-traffic-in-sf\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Braided Streets’- my proposal for how to organize traffic in SF"},"content":{"rendered":"
The fight over what our streets look like is perpetual in this city. Bicyclists love Valencia and Folsom, and want other streets to be just like them. Car-owners and taxis love Franklin, South Van Ness, Guerrero, etc. Transit (aka buses and streetcars) does well on Mission, Market, and Haight, amongst others. Pedestrians seem to like the streets that are optimized for bikes and transit.<\/p>\n
It seems that there is a showdown brewing between the newly powerful bike coalition, the Muni supporters, and people who drive, as more and more streets get sharrows<\/a> or a bike lane. However, I think we can avoid some of the strife by acknowledging that the three types of vehicles (bikes, transit, and cars) simply shouldn\u2019t<\/em> coexist on many streets- or at least, I don\u2019t think there is a configuration that makes all parties happy. If optimized for bikes, cars and transit are slow, if optimized for cars, bikes and pedestrians are in danger, if optimized for transit bikes are in danger and both cars and bikes are slow.<\/p>\n Instead, we should have a \u2018braided street\u2019 model, where we alternate which streets are optimized for which modes of transit. We already partially have that model in the Mission, and I think it does pretty well. Going from west to east:<\/p>\n